In case you missed it, South Carolina managed to
pull out a close one over the Tigers on Saturday dropping the Clemson record to 8-4 on the season.
Of course, even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and again as this was only the second time in ten years that Carolina managed to defeat the Tigers.
Go figure.
But make no mistake, the Gamecocks outplayed Clemson Saturday. So how'd the Tigers do against the
"keys"?
1. Throw deep. The first Clemson series of the game saw a 76-yard touchdown pass to Jacoby Ford. The rest of the game saw ... nothing. Um, it worked once guys, why not try it again? And yes, I know the defender fell down--but so what. Ford just showed he could catch the long one. Throw deep, darnit. Tigers get a C for this one despite the one play success.
2. Get two big plays. Well, this was clearly a poor choice for a "key". Every touchdown for the Tigers was a play over over 30 yards. All four of them. Amazing, huh? I have a theory. The two big plays from Spiller and Ford early in the game forced the Tiger defense back onto the field with limited rest. They were tired. Yup. That's my theory, and I'm sticking to it. I guess. I have to give the team an A+ for this one. They did make it exciting.
3. Hold Carolina to under 15 points. Um ... F. Carolina put together 31 points and 492 yards of offense. Where'd the Clemson defense disappear to? I have no idea. Of course, the Tiger defense gathered up 3 interceptions on the day--which should have been 5. Ugh. Blake Mitchell played well enough to win the game for the Gamecocks. There was no pressure on the quarterback. Poor tackling. I could go on.
So there ya have it. If you would have told me that Clemson would score 28 points at home against South Carolina, I would have guaranteed victory every time you said it.
I would have been wrong.
I hate being wrong.
The only question left now is, where are we "bowling"?