
So far, so good: we're one day into the life without
Bryant Gumbel and NFL Network is still standing. Yesterday, FanHouse's Michael David Smith
pointed out that the network released a statement claiming both parties said it was Gumbel's decision to step aside.
After seeing today's
New York Times, I wonder if "both parties" actually means "NFL Network." From the
Times' Richard Sandomir:
Bornstein publicly supported Gumbel, even as Gumbel struggled with the mechanics of play-by-play. When reached by telephone, Bornstein declined to say if he had asked Gumbel to leave.
Of course, Gumbel
explained via e-mail that "What happened is we had a conversation and we agreed to go in different directions. It's really as simple as that," so maybe Bornstein's just being coy by refusing to answer the question. Either way, Gumbel's out and the NFL Network now needs a play-by-play guy for their eight regular-season games.
I'm quite certain I'm in the minority, but I didn't mind In-the-Booth Gumbel. The same person who came across as pompous and smug as an interviewer was surprisingly likable when working football games. Sure, he made mistakes (a lot of them, actually) but I'm willing to put up with a few "Rick Romos" if it means I don't have to hear the idiotic ramblings you're sometimes subjected to on other national networks that televise their games on, say, Monday nights. Apparently, that's just me, though.
Whatever, what's done is done. And word on the street has Tom Hammond, an NBC employee since 1984, as the early frontrunner to replace Gumbel.