
I was blown away to see that the Ravens gave up three draft picks, including two third-rounders,
to Buffalo for Willis McGahee. It's nothing against McGahee, he's an okay running back. It seems to me, though, that running backs are the most easily-replaced players on the field.
Clinton Portis goes down for the Redskins, Ladell Betts steps right in. Denver gets ridiculous production from their running back position every year, no matter who's back there. Every year, there's a handful of rookies or backups who step in and produce. Guys like Chester Taylor, Ron Dayne, Julius Jones, Travis Henry, Marion Barber ... all averaging over 4 yards a carry.
My point is this: if your team doesn't already have a guy on the roster who can average over 4 yards per carry, then your GM has probably screwed up pretty badly, either at the running back position, or leaving some other glaring deficiency with the offense. And unless it's one of the elite running backs in the league (and there definitely aren't more than two or three of those), it's not worth giving up a ton of money and/or draft picks to get someone else's running back. It's not hot. You can fill that hole somewhere else.
Let's look at the situation for the Browns, who gave a ton of money to Jamal Lewis ... I just wonder, what is Jamal Lewis going to give them that Reuben Droughns couldn't? No, Cleveland couldn't run the ball, but was that Droughns' fault? When Jason Wright or Jerome Harrison got in the game, they couldn't run, either.
Could it be that Cleveland's anemic passing game let other teams sell out on the run, limiting Droughns' room? And Jamal Lewis, in Baltimore, behind a better line and in a more balanced offense, got 3.6 yards per carry. I'm expected to believe that the difference between Droughns' and Lewis is worth
any kind of substantial investment?
Cleveland, like any other team who invests a ton of money or draft picks for a running back, could have spent that money better elsewhere.