Jason Whitlock has reason to be concerned about Matt Cassel. He's the Chiefs new quarterback, doesn't have much in the way of experience, and will make nearly $15 million in 2009. Oh, and it's easy to be skittish when Cassel succeeds the likes of Damon Huard, Brodie Croyle and Tyler Thigpen. Of the three, Thigpen probably has the most potential, but the new regime made it clear that he wasn't in their long-term plans when they traded for Cassel. But that doesn't mean Whitlock is convinced.
Specifically, he's worried that the Chiefs "have little interest in signing Matt Cassel to a long-term contract before the start of the season." There were rumors during draft weekend that the Chiefs gave Cassel a six-year deal ($36 million guaranteed). Untrue, it turned out.

Because the NFL season never ends, we present our
Commence housecleaning in Kansas City. The Chiefs won two games last season,
So, let's imagine for a second that you're the front office of the Kansas City Chiefs. You just fluffed your fans earlier in the week with the notion of bringing recently retired
If there was ever a situation to describe the Kansas City Chiefs of late,
If you're wondering why the Kansas City Chiefs would be interested in a "retired" quarterback that hasn't been effective since 2004, let me give you a short list. 

If you had asked most people what the Chiefs (0-3) needed to beat the Broncos (3-0) on Sunday, suggestions would have ranged from "a time machine to take them back to 2003" to "


























