I was watching a local sports show earlier today when the question came up about Jason Campbell. The Redskins sacrificed a bunch of draft picks, including the one used on Patrick Ramsey, to select the Auburn QB two years ago. Two years later and one of the guys on the program said (paraphrasing), "Campbell's not even good enough to beat out a career backup in Todd Collins." He went on to question whether or not Campbell is not what the coaches were hoping for.
Knowing coach Joe Gibbs and his history when it comes to the QB position, I seriously doubt that the decision for Collins to be number two has that much to do with Campbell being a disappointment. Just as much as Gibbs has been stroking Collins' ego, Gibbs has been reiterating that Campbell is the future. History has shown that Gibbs doesn't quite like leaving the team in the hands of an inexperienced QB.
A lot of critics are pointing out the high draft position, the money, the this and that, but Gibbs is from the old school. Players didn't play back then just because they were drafted in the first round. Or earned millions of dollars they haven't earned yet. Or got their face on the cover of every publication and aired on every sports network. Gibbs comes from a time when you had to win your job based off of when the coach felt like you ready, not the media or the fans.
I'd hate to think any coach being paid millions ($5 million for Gibbs) a year just to make decisions based on the morning papers.
When Jay Schroeder was going to be the next star in the nation's capital, Gibbs signed an experienced backup for more money. It didn't take long before Doug Williams led the team to a Super Bowl victory. And who has been talking about the decision to not play Schroeder more?
I'm not saying Collins is going to be the answer if Mark Brunell goes down. I'm just saying Gibbs' decision to keep Campbell third on the depth chart is based on years of experience of developing winning quarterbacks to good ol' fashion way: coaching.