
Boy oh boy, after reading
this you really have to wonder what the Bengals were thinking taking Frostee Rucker in the third round.
Right up front, let me clarify by saying that I have no problem with a team taking someone with a troubled past. As a Bengals fan I know that plenty of players get a bad rap that isn't indicative of who they truly are. Chad Johnson fell to the Bengals in the second round because of perceived character issues, and that's worked out extremely well.
But Frostee Rucker's case is kind of above and beyond. His latest charges are his third in nine years, which might not sound terrible, until you hear that all three have involved abuse of women, including a rape allegation when he was 13 (the girl was 11). At Colorado State Rucker was accused of assaulting a female athlete and exposing himself in a classroom, and his latest charges are assualt related brought by a former girlfriend.
If it comes up over and over and over again, then that starts to suggest something. It's the exposing himself in a classroom thing that really worries me, perhaps surprisingly since it's the smallest thing he's been accused of doing. But it suggest to me that Rucker has a mindset that the rules don't apply to him, and that he can do whatever he wants, without consequence. Quite frankly, from what I'm reading in the Columbus Dispatch, Rucker sounds like a mentally ill individual.
And the Bengals used a third rounder on the guy? This can't even be classified as a late round flyer, not to mention the fact that many draft experts saw the Bengals as grossly reaching when they selected Rucker in the third.
Obviously Rucker's career is just beginning, and everything could look quite a bit different in five years. But right now I really have to question this pick, in a way that I haven't questioned the Bengals before. Chris Henry, A.J. Nicholson, and others didn't bother me, but I'm really not sure I agree with the Bengals turning a blind eye to Rucker's past.
More:
Trail of allegations follows Rucker - Columbus Dispatch