By now you've all heard about Pete Rose and his exploits in the Dan Patrick show this week. You've heard what countless talking heads, bloggers, and just about everyone thinks about his confession that he bet on the Reds every night as manager. And now to you can add the thoughts of John Dowd, author of the infamous Dowd Report that got Rose banned from baseball. To put it simply, Dowd doesn't even remotely believe Rose's assertion that he bet on his own team to win every night. I'm with Dowd on this one. If Rose was half as competitive a gambler as he was a baseball player, there's no way he bet on his team to win every night because there's no way he actually thought the Reds were going 162-0. It's not like he walked into the clubhouse each and every night, threw a pile of cash on the table and said, "This is how much I believe in you guys," so what would the point of always betting the Reds to win be? And if he wasn't betting on the Reds every night like he said, than Dowd is exactly right; Rose's gambling patterns were a giant beacon to bookies on the Reds' chances that night, and you can't honestly believe that Rose didn't know that."When (Mario) Soto and (Bill) Gullickson pitched, he didn't bet on the Reds," Dowd said on Thursday, when reached at his Washington, D.C. office...
The Dowd Report says Rose bet on the Reds 52 times in 1987. Each Major League Baseball team plays 162 games.
Dowd has said that when Rose didn't bet on the Reds, it was a signal to bookies that it might be a good night to bet on the Reds' opponent.
In twenty years Rose has gone from never betting on baseball to betting on baseball but not the Reds to betting on the Reds to win every single night. Anyone care to guess what comes next?

























