
Since the playoffs have started,
Joe Borowski has been getting knocked by just about everyone with an opinion. When
I picked the Indians to win the World Series, my fellow 'Housers screamed "WITH BOROWSKI?!?" Tony Gwynn was incredulous that Eric Wedge brought him in to close out game 4.
Bill Simmons and
Slate are piling on mercilessly today and I could probably furnish 100 more links if I really wanted to. But instead, let's look at Borowski's 2007 and see if it was really all that bad.
First off, he's a relief pitcher. He only pitched 65 and 2/3 innings this year. That means that his high ERA (5.07) could easily be inflated by a couple of bad outings, like, say the two outings in April and May when Borowski gave up six and four runs in less than an inning.
Since May 13th, the four run outing that raised his ERA to 9.00, Borowski's line has looked like this: 3.91 ERA, 1.34 WHIP, 40 Ks, 10 BB, all in 50 and 2/3 innings. It's not fantastic, but it's certainly passable or better. Another way to look at it is to compare the Indians' record in games Borowski has appeared in to the other closers left in the playoffs. The Tribe is 58-11 when Borowski takes the mound.
The D'Backs are 54-11 when
Jose Valverde takes the mound while
the Red Sox are 50-9 with
Jonathan Papelbon on the mound.
Yes, they're both better relievers than Borowski and I'm not arguing that. Keep in mind that
Eric Wedge hasn't used Borowski for more than an inning all year while
Rafael Betancourt has made
25 multiple inning appearances and
Rafael Perez has 26. That suggests to me that Wedge pretty clearly knows the limits of his closer. So long as Wedge keeps using Borowski like he did during the season and in the ALDS and not like the Red Sox used
Keith Foulke in 2004, I think all of the Borowski dumping could well turn out to be much ado about nothing.