So much attention was put on Trent Green's absence from the first game against the Benglas that nobody seemed to notice when another familiar veteran headed for the bench: Sammy Knight. However, unlike Green, Knight didn't have an excuse. He wasn't subbed in for; he was replaced.
The writing was on the wall throughout training camp. At least, it should have been for those who follow the Chiefs. Knight had to have smelled pressure all around him. Do you think he might have taken notice when the Chiefs drafted not one, but two safeties in the draft? Do you think he might have taken notice when the Chiefs, according to many draft experts, reached to nab Bernard Pollard in the second round to assure that they got a good, young safety? Do you think he might have taken notice when every report out of training camp indicated that Pollard and Jarrad Page were making the most waves with their play on the field?
I have long contended that Knight was a liability last year. He was a great addition to this team, because he was instrumental in molding Kawika Mitchell into the player he is today. However, Knight made some big mistakes last year. He missed key tackles. He was virtually worthless covering tight ends. He almost had a bullseye on his back when he looked like he was going to slip into coverage. The first game against the Bengals, it seemed like more of the same. Carson Palmer seemed to look immediately in Knight's direction on every play.
But Herm saw it from day 1. Knight's job was in jeopardy the minute Herm Edwards assumed the role of head coach. Edwards, a brilliant coach of defensive backs, seemed to be eagerly anticipating the day he could slip one of his rookies into a starting role. Do you think Knight took notice? My simple response: yes, he finally did. Knight was never around the ball in any preseason game or against the Bengals. He seemed more like the player the Chiefs expected him to be against the Broncos. He was disrupting plays. A few times, his instinct led him to the ball well before the play developed.
Still, for as well as Knight played, there are still questions that need to be answered. Namely, is he becoming a liability in the passing game? He certainly was against Cincinnati; he wasn't against Denver. Then again, Denver didn't seem to throw downfield much of the game. And for as well as Knight has played, Jarrad Page has played absolutely outstanding.
Page, like Knight, has a nose for the ball, but Page can get there so much quicker. And Bernard Pollard has to be knocking on the door as well. Point being, Knight had a good game against Denver, but he will need to be that good throughout the season or else he may be out of a job.
One wonders how much longer Knight will last. He was never fast to begin with, but lately he seems to have lost even more speed on top of that. He seems to be trudging by on instincts which, amazingly, have been surprisingly inconsistent since he became a Chief. To me, Knight is like that old trusty car you have that's on its last leg. You know you can do better. But how can you dump something that's been so reliable for so long? It's only a matter of time before Pollard or Page assumes the starting role for the Chiefs. It's all a matter of how much more quality mileage Knight can get out of his tank. Unlike last year, the Chiefs have a new car waiting for them. If Knight sputters even for a split-second, Herm Edwards will not hesitate to take his new players for a spin.