
As the Super Bowl afterglow dims, and we move towards the off-season, it seems like a lot of teams out there have their eye on Jeff Garcia ... the
Vikings, the
Bears, the
Buccaneers ... there's even a
small minority of Eagles fans that want him to start next year.
And that's to be expected ... tt's an extremely thin free agent crop at the quarterback position, and Garcia was impressive with the Eagles in the season's second half. I'd be
reeeally careful about giving him any kind of significant financial deal, though.
I think teams would be wise to keep three things in mind. 1) That Andy Reid knew exactly what Garcia's strengths and weaknesses were, and he knew that he had a system tailored perfectly to fit Garcia, 2) Garcia's 2004 season with the Browns, and 3) his 2005 season with the Lions.
Both the Browns and the Lions were thinking along the same lines as Garcia's potential suitors this off-season ... "we'll just bring him in to be a steady veteran presence until we can develop a younger guy." He was mediocre with the Browns and terrible with the Lions, both teams cut him after one year, and neither developed another decent quarterback in the meantime.
It's nothing against Jeff Garcia ... I'm not trying to tell you that he's a terrible quarterback. In a certain system, obviously, he can be effective, but teams should be very careful about what they ask Garcia to do. I tend to believe that backing up Donovan McNabb is the best place for Garcia, and it might be best if other teams leave him there. Ending up with the 2004 or 2005 version of Garcia is no prize.