
Seeing as he's trotted out every other trick available in his press battles, at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he did. For Game 4, it was another controversial goal that had Ted angry. After a shift by Kozlov/Yashin/Satan that had me checking to see if gravity had temporarily reversed itself, the puck wound up underneath Ryan Miller and he and the puck were pushed into the net by both Satan and Brendan Witt (who came in skates first).
To quote the NHL Rulebook:
Rule 69.6... In the event that a goalkeeper has been pushed into the net together with the puch after making a stop, the goal will be disallowed....
In the event that the puck is under a player in or around the crease area (deliberately or otherwise), a goal cannot be scored by pushing this player together with the puck into the goal.
The play was not reviewed as it is not reviewable. There was a conference with the league to ensure that the rule Leggo was applying was indeed the right one. During the post-game show on WGR550 last night, Brad Riter got confirmation from the league that the rule quoted above was the correct one in that situation.
Nolan's repsonse, "I don't care what anyone says, that's a goal!"
Just like Vanek's goal in Game 3 was not a goal either, right Ted? The replay that both Vs. and TSN had, which Islander's Army has here) clearly showed the puck entering the net and going behind the post. Nolan's argument has been that the puck disappears so you don't have incontrovertible proof. Well, I hate to break this to him, but the puck disappears because it went behind the post, which is, in fact (not opinion), inside the goal. There's no way for the puck to be behind the post and not be completely in the goal. Going back to physics, the puck didn't teleport away briefly in a fit of brownian motion or carried on a cosmic string to an alternate universe for a split second. It was in the net because you could logically deduce it was. It was a goal.
Now, I was convinced the calls would go the other way both times while watching it, as I've seen similar situations end up with different results. Such is the psyche of a long-time Sabres fan.
Sorry, Teddy, you've done a great job this series but the difference in these games has been that the Sabres have manufactured the breaks you're complaing that they're getting and your guys haven't. Victimology will only take you so far as a motivational tool. At some point you have to put a sock in that and move on. Lindy Ruff has had to learn that the hard way, and maybe winning has something to do with the change. But, regardless, there's going to come a point where your team isn't the underdog and I hope for your guys that you act accordingly.
Ta,