Tell me that Tony Stewart is not trying to
blame his
bullsh*t on ESPN:
"Obviously, if we had 10 minutes to think about what we were going to say before we said things, it would give us a bigger advantage in not getting in those situations."
Obviously, the network is not going to wait around 10 minutes for the drivers to gather their thoughts after the race. They're trying to get through the post-race interviews and victory celebration as quickly as possible and on to the next program.
But who cares about that BS anymore? I want to know more about his beef with the questions ESPN is asking him:
"Every time we've got to deal with somebody from ESPN it's a sharp knife trying to dig for dirt. I'm not saying they're not fair questions. Do we always have to leave with a dagger on our back from ESPN? That's all I'm curious about."
All I'm curious about is, what kind of dirt is it that they are they trying to dig up that's got him so riled up he's going off about it? Is it really as simple as "ESPN couldn't ask positive, creative questions like the rest of the media?" And what kind of provocative questions are they asking? Are they trying to flame the rivalries or are we talking about trying to drudge up some sensational baby mama drama-type stuff? I mean, if they're fair questions, as he says, what's his beef?
As much as ESPN has managed to annoy the fans since taking over the Nextel Cup broadcasts in the last couple of weeks, they got a head start on annoying Tony Stewart.
